I’m Kayla Sox. I test tools for a living. I also care about safety and truth. So when a friend asked me about onlyfakes.app, I checked it out. I used test info only. No real ID stuff. I did this for review and research. I later turned those notes into a full write-up for Woopid if you’re curious about every gritty detail.
You know what? I felt weird the whole time. But let me explain.
What it claims, in plain words
The site says it can make ID-like images with AI. That’s the pitch. It looks slick at first. Big promise, fast results, no real company details. That last part made my gut twist.
If you want a quick security pulse-check, you can also plug the domain into Gridinsoft’s online virus scanner for an automated look at any lurking malware flags.
Using fake ID images is illegal. It can hurt people. It can get you in real trouble. I don’t support that, and I won’t teach it. I stuck to harmless test data.
What I actually saw on screen
The homepage was clean but vague. No clear team names. No address. The FAQ felt thin. I tried it on my laptop and my phone. It loaded fast on both. The whole thing felt rushed, like a pop-up shop.
There were a lot of document “styles” in the gallery. The thumbnails looked glossy. Too glossy. Like a movie prop.
Tests I tried (with fake info)
I use a simple test set for risky sites like this:
- Name: Jordan Lake
- Birthday: 04/12/1992
- Address: 123 Marsh Lane
- Photo: my face with a giant “TEST” watermark across it
I ran three trials. I saved the outputs to a sandbox folder. I did not use any real details. Not once.
What came out? Images that looked “good” from far away. Up close, not so much.
- The face shadow was off. My chin light didn’t match the background.
- The tiny text looked soft, like a smear.
- The fancy “holo” area looked flat. No real shine when I tilted my screen.
- A code on the back would not scan with two free scanner apps.
- The borders had a faint halo, like a cutout from a school project.
One file had a date that made no sense. My fake birthday was April, but a printed date said February. Little slips like that break trust fast.
Did it work? Kind of. But also not. Like a toy mask.
Talk to me like a human: did I feel safe?
No. The site asked for personal details early, and it didn’t explain data rules well. I looked for a privacy contact. Nothing solid. I sent a test support note. I got a canned reply eight hours later. No real names. No signature. That’s a red flag.
I’ve seen shady apps before. This had that same “too easy” glow. Easy is nice for pizza. Not for documents. It reminded me of when I tested a “free” nudify tool—here’s what really happened—same slick promises, same red flags.
A small digression: art vs. harm
I get it. Some folks do prop work. Film. Theater. Cosplay. Even classroom demos. There are legit ways to make props. Local print shops can help. There are prop ID vendors for film sets with clear “NOT A REAL ID” marks. That path is safer. Clear use. Clear rules.
This? This felt like a shortcut to real trouble. And shortcuts have potholes.
Performance stuff (quick hits)
- Speed: The image built in under a minute. That’s fast.
- Quality: Okay from far away. Falls apart on close look.
- Mobile: Works, but the preview clipped text on my phone.
- Files: Small size, which is odd for “high detail” claims.
Support and trust
- No clear company info.
- Terms link loaded once, then broke.
- Refund talk was foggy.
- The chat felt like a bot, not a person.
Need an external second opinion? Take a peek at its ScamAdviser profile and note the mixed trust indicators.
I don’t need hand-holding. But I do need a real door to knock on if things go wrong. That lesson hit home again during my week-long dive into GetNudeApp—the real tea is right here—where anonymity and vague policies nearly tripped me up.
Along the same lines, readers who still wonder whether any “nude snap” platform can be remotely safe should check out Nude Snap — the article breaks down how the service works, what data it collects, and the practical steps you can take to protect your privacy before sharing anything sensitive.
Who should use it?
Honestly? No one. Not for anything real. Not for fun, either. It puts your face and data at risk. It invites trouble. It’s not worth it.
Safer picks instead
If you need:
- A fun photo: use FaceApp, Lensa, or Snapchat filters.
- A work ID badge template: use Canva or Adobe Express with “SAMPLE” across it.
- Testing for a project: use official sandbox kits from companies like Stripe or Onfido. They have fake sample data made for tests.
- A real ID: go to your DMV or the proper office. Boring, yes. But it’s the right way.
For readers in Connecticut who would rather skip the ID fakery altogether and simply meet consenting adults through a transparent, vetted directory, take a moment to browse the listings at Tryst Bridgeport. The page offers verified profiles, clear screening guidelines, and safety tips so you can arrange real-world encounters responsibly and without legal headaches.
For a broader look at safe, user-vetted tools, check out Woopid where you can compare options side by side.
The human moment
When I finished, I closed the tab, made tea, and fed my cat. I sat there thinking about how easy it is to slip. One click. Then two. Then trouble. I’d rather not see anyone fall into that.
Verdict
- Price-to-value: poor
- Quality: looks good at a glance, breaks on close look
- Safety: not okay
- Trust: thin
Score: 1/5. I won’t use it again.
If you’re even a little unsure, that’s your sign. Close the tab. Choose the honest path. It’s slower, but it lets you sleep at night.